Knee Special Tests: The Complete Clinical Assessment Guide

Knee special tests are at their most useful when they confirm or refute a hypothesis you already formed from the history and observation - mechanism of injury, swelling pattern, locking, and giving way tell you which cluster to run. This guide gathers the tests that actually change management, grouped by suspected structure, with how to perform each one and how to interpret a positive or negative result.

Special tests

Choose the ligament cluster the mechanism suggests - a valgus contact injury points to the MCL and ACL; hyperextension or a dashboard blow points to the PCL.

  • Lachman test
  • Anterior drawer test
  • Posterior drawer test
  • Pivot shift test
  • Valgus & varus stress tests

Special tests

No single meniscal test is reliable alone - combine joint-line tenderness with a provocation test and interpret as a cluster.

  • McMurray test
  • Thessaly test
  • Joint-line tenderness
  • Apley compression test

Special tests

  • Patellar apprehension test
  • Clarke's sign (patellar grind)

Frequently asked questions

What is the most accurate special test for an ACL tear?

The Lachman test is the most accurate clinical test for ACL integrity, with high sensitivity and specificity. It is performed at 20–30° of flexion, where hamstring guarding is reduced, making it more reliable acutely than the anterior drawer test.

How do you test for a meniscus tear?

No single test is conclusive. Combine joint-line tenderness with a provocation test such as McMurray or the weight-bearing Thessaly test, and interpret them as a cluster alongside the history of locking, catching, or giving way.

What is the difference between the Lachman and anterior drawer tests?

Both assess the ACL. The Lachman is performed at 20–30° of flexion and is more reliable acutely; the anterior drawer is performed at 90°, where effusion and hamstring spasm reduce its sensitivity in the early stages after injury.

How accurate are knee special tests?

Accuracy varies by test and by how acute the injury is. Diagnostic value rises substantially when tests are clustered for a single hypothesis and interpreted alongside the mechanism of injury, swelling pattern, and functional testing.